The Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja has dismissed former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai’s ₦120 million fundamental rights enforcement suit against federal investigative and security agencies.
Delivering judgment on Monday, Justice Sylvanus Oriji held that the suit lacked merit and awarded ₦200,000 in costs to each of the four respondents, bringing the total to ₦800,000.
The proceedings concerned actions by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the Department of State Services (DSS) and the Attorney-General of the Federation.
Investigation Invitations Did Not Breach Rights, Court Rules
Justice Oriji held that letters inviting El-Rufai for investigation did not violate his fundamental rights.
The judge found that the investigative agencies acted within their statutory responsibilities by asking the former governor to respond to issues raised against him.
He maintained that the court could not be used to prevent the agencies from carrying out their lawful duties.
The ruling follows separate proceedings in which El-Rufai sought protection against actions affecting his bank accounts and assets.
Judge Upholds DSS Action at Abuja Airport
The court also considered whether the DSS violated El-Rufai’s rights through an attempt to arrest him at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.
Justice Oriji accepted the agency’s argument that its statutory responsibilities included maintaining watchlists and arresting persons of interest.
He rejected the former governor’s argument concerning the absence of an arrest warrant, holding that the DSS possessed relevant police powers under its governing legal framework.
The judge further held that the seizure of El-Rufai’s international passport did not constitute a violation of his rights in the circumstances considered by the court.
Four Respondents Awarded Costs
Having rejected the claims, Justice Oriji dismissed the suit and ordered El-Rufai to pay ₦200,000 to each respondent.
The judgment addressed the alleged infringement of the former governor’s fundamental rights. It did not determine his guilt or innocence concerning the allegations underlying the investigations.
Get breaking news and latest updates directly on WhatsApp
